Midwest Medication Safety Symposium (M2S2) Webinar -Improving Safety Culture and Engagement Through Peer Review +The Art of the Medication History: Avoiding Compounding Mistakes


Midwest Medication Safety Symposium (M2S2) Webinar -Improving Safety Culture and Engagement Through Peer Review +The Art of the Medication History: Avoiding Compounding Mistakes Banner

Add to Calendar Midwest Medication Safety Symposium (M2S2) Webinar -Improving Safety Culture and Engagement Through Peer Review +The Art of the Medication History: Avoiding Compounding Mistakes 1/28/2021 12:00:00 PM 1/28/2022 1:30:00 PM America/New_York For More Details: https://iu.cloud-cme.com/course/courseoverview?P=0&EID=60642 online false MM/DD/YYYY


Date & Location
Thursday, January 28, 2021, 12:00 PM - Friday, January 28, 2022, 1:30 PM, online, Indianapolis, IN

Target Audience
Specialties - Patient Safety and Quality, Performance Improvement

Overview

The Midwest Medication Safety Symposium (M2S2) Lunch & Learns are fourteen one-hour virtual interdisciplinary meetings created to provide an opportunity for health-care providers to collaborate and learn new medication safety strategies. Each Lunch & Learns focuses on improving medication safety practices and patient outcomes through education of pharmacists and interprofessional health care teams and is recorded for future viewing.

This video is the recorded presentation from the live session on October 9, 2020. 

Launch Date; 1/28/2021

Expiration Date: 1/28/2022

How to obtain CE credits:

Please note, you have to watch the entire video in order to receive any CE credit for this online activity.

Sign in or create a new account by clicking "Sign In" in top left corner. *If you previously participated in a CME activity accredited by IUSM  but do not know your password, please enter your email address and click on the 'Forget Your Password' link. Your password will be emailed to you.

  1. Click the Tests tile > Launch Video to view the module.
  2. After viewing the video go back to the Tests tile and click Post-Test to attest to completing the activity.
  3. Click the MyCME button > Evaluations and Certificates
  4. Find the activity name in the list and click Complete Evaluation.
  5. Click Submit.
  6. On the Evaluations and Certificates page, click Download Certificate or access your transcript through the Transcript tile.
Please note that you are not able to claim credit if you already attended the live virtual conference on October 9, 2020. 

Objectives
At the conclusion of this activity, participants will be able to: 

  1. Explain medication safety terminology and methodology for frontline staff, students, new and established practitioners as well as direct and non-direct patient caregivers;
  2. Recognize the importance and be able to incorporate an interdisciplinary approach to medication safety; and
  3. Review opportunities to improve medication safety through the use of technology, process improvement, and implementing innovative or evidence based best practices.

Accreditation
In support of improving patient care, this activity has been planned and implemented by Indiana University School of Medicine and Indianapolis Coalition for Patient Safety, Inc. Indiana University School of Medicine is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.
Nurses
Indiana University School of Medicine designates this activity for a maximum of 1.0 ANCC contact hours. Nurses should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

Pharmacists and Pharmacy Technicians
Indiana University School of Medicine designates this activity (JA4008178-9999-21-038-H05-P and JA4008178-9999-21-038-H05-T) for 1.0 ACPE contact hours. Pharmacists  and Pharmacy Technicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Credit will be provided to NABP CPE Monitor within 60 days after the activity completion.

Physicians
Indiana University School of Medicine designates this live activity for a maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

 

List of References:

  • American Nurses Association (ANA). Peer Review Guidelines. Kansas City, MO: ANA; 1988. https://www.americannursetoday.com/nursing-peer-review-principles-and-practice/
  • Branowicki, P., Driscoll, M., Hickey, P., Renaud, K., & Sporing, E. (2011). Exemplary professional practice through nurse peer review. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 26, 128-136.
  • Brooks, O., Rieger-Kligys, M. (1995). Peer review: An approach to performance evaluation in a professional practice model. Critical Care Nursing Quarterly
  • Davis, K., Capozzoli, J. & Parks, J. (2009). Implementing peer review- Guidelines for managers and staff. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 33(3), 251-257.
  • Diaz, L. (2008). Nursing peer review: Developing a framework for patient safety. The Journal of Nursing Administration, 38(11), 475-479. 
    Garner, J. K. (2015) Implementation of a nursing peer-review program in the hospital setting. Clinical Nurse Specialist. Online publication. doi: 10.1097/NUR.0000000000000149
  • Haag-Heitman, B., & George, V. (2011). Peer review in nursing: Principles for successful practice. Sudbury, Mass: Jones and Bartlett.
  • Haag-Heitman, B. & George, V. (2011). Nursing peer review: Principles and practice, American Nurse Today. Retrieved from https://www.amicannursetoday.com/nursing-peer-review-principles
  • Korkis, L., Ternavan, K., Ladak, A., Maines, M., Ribeiro, D., & Hickey, S. (2019). Mentoring clinical nurses toward a just culture: Successful implementation of nursing peer case review. The Journal of Nursing Administration, 49(7/8), 384-388.
  • Morby, S. K. & Skalla, A. (2010). A human care approach to nursing peer review. Nursing Science Quarterly, 23(4), 297-300. 
  • Porter-O’Grady, Tim, Malloch, Kathy. (2013) Leadership in Nursing Practice. Burlington, MA. Jones & Bartlett 
  • Pfeiffer, J. A., Wickline, M. A., Deetz, J., & Berry, E. S. (2012). Assessing RN-to-RN peer review on clinical units. Journal of Nursing Management, 20, 390-400. 
  • Staveski, S., Leong, K., Graham, K. Pu, L., & Roth, S. (2012). Nursing mortality and morbidity and journal club cycles. AACN Advanced Critical Care, 23(2), 133-141. 
  • Spiva, L. A., Jarrell, N. & Baio, P. (2014). The power of nursing peer review. The Journal of Nursing Administration, 44(11), 586-590.
  • Coleman EA, Smith JD, Raha D, Min SJ. Posthospital medication discrepancies: prevalence and contributing factors. Arch Intern Med. 2005 Sep 12;165(16):1842-47.
  • Gleason KM, Brake H, Agramonte V, Perfetti C. Medications at Transitions and Clinical Handoffs (MATCH) Toolkit for Medication Reconciliation. (Prepared by the Island Peer Review Organization, Inc., under Contract No. HHSA2902009000 13C.) AHRQ Publication No. 11(12)-0059. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Revised August 2012.
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Medications at Transitions and Clinical Handoffs (MATCH) Toolkit for Medication Reconciliation. Available from https://www.ahrq.gov/patient-safety/resources/match/index.html.
  • Cipolle RJ, Strand LM, Morley PC. Drug Therapy Problems. In Pharmaceutical Care Practice: The Patient-Centered Approach to Medication Management. New York: McGraw Hill, 2012: 157.
  • Gleason K, McDaniel M, Feinglass J, et al. Results of the Medications at Transitions and Clinical Handoffs (MATCH) study: an analysis of medication reconciliation errors and risk factors at hospital admission. J Gen Intern Med 2010;25(5):441–447.
  • Digiantonio N, Lund J, Bastow S. Impact of a Pharmacy-Led Medication Reconciliation Program. P T. 2018;43(2):105–110.
  • Bowman C, McKenna J, Schneider P, Barnes B. Comparison of Medication History Accuracy Between Nurses and Pharmacy Personnel. J Pharm Pract. 2019 Feb;32(1):62-67.
  • Buckley MS, Harinstein LM, Clark KB, et al. Impact of a clinical pharmacy admission medication reconciliation program on medication errors in "high-risk" patients. Ann Pharmacother. 2013;47(12):1599-1610.
  • Stranges P, Jackevicius CA, Anderson SL, et al. ACCP White Paper: Role of clinical pharmacists and pharmacy support personnel in transitions of care. J Am Coll Clin Pharm 2020;3(2):532-545.
  • King PK, Burkhardt C, Rafferty A, et al. ACCP White Paper: Quality Measures of Clinical Pharmacy Services During Transitions of Care. J Am Coll Clin Pharm. 2020 [accepted, pending publication]
  • Salanitro AH, Kripalani S, Resnic J, Mueller SK, Wetterneck TB, Haynes KT, Stein J, Kaboli PJ, Labonville S, Etchells E, et al. Rational and design of the multicenter medication reconciliation quality improvement study (MARQUIS). BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:230.
  • Reeder TA, Mutnick A. Pharmacist- versus physician-obtained medication histories. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2008;65:857-860.
  • Vasileff HM, Whitten LE, Pink JA, Goldsworthy SJ, Angley MT. The effect on medication errors of pharmacists charting medication in an emergency department. Pharm World Sci. 2009;373-379.
  • Sarzynski EM, Luz CC, Rios-Bedoya CF, Zhou S. Considerations for using the 'brown bag' strategy to reconcile medications during routine outpatient office visits. Qual Prim Care. 2014;22(4):177-87.
  • Mekonnen AB, McLachian AJ, Brien JA. Pharmacy-led medication recon- ciliation programmes at hospital transitions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2016;41:128-144.
  • Mueller SK, Sponsler KC, Kripalani S, Schnipper JL. Hospital-based medication reconciliation practices: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2012;23:1057-1069.
  • Sanchez GM, Douglass MA, Mancuso MA. Revisiting project re-engineered discharge (RED): the impact of a pharmacist telephone intervention on hospital readmission rates. Pharmacotherapy. 2015;35(9):805-12.
  • Fosnight S, King P, Ewald J, et al. Effects of pharmacy interventions at transitions of care on patient outcomes. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2020;77(12):943-9.
  • Mixon AS, Kripalani S, Stein J, et al. An On-Treatment Analysis of the MARQUIS Study: Interventions to Improve Inpatient Medication Reconciliation. J. Hosp. Med 2019;10;614-617.
  • Marquis Implementation Manual: A Guide for Medication Reconciliation Quality Improvement.
  • Alex S, Adenew AB, Arundel C, Maron DD, Kerns JC. Medication Errors Despite Using Electronic Health Records: The Value of a Clinical Pharmacist Service in Reducing Discharge-Related Medication Errors. Qual Manag Health Care. 2016;25(1):32-7.
  • Anderegg SV, Wilkinson ST, Couldry RJ, Grauer DW, Howser E. Effects of a hospital wide pharmacy practice model change on readmission and return to emergency department rates. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2014;71(17):1469-79.
  • Pharmacy Quality Alliance. PQA Endorses A New Monitoring Measure to Evaluate Resolution of Medication Therapy Problems. May 2019. Available from www.pqaalliance.org/pqa-endorses-new-monitoring-measure.
  • By the 2019 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria. Update Expert Panel. American Geriatrics Society 2019 Updated AGS Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019;67(4):674-94.
  • Hanlon JT, Schmader KE, Samsa GP, Weinberger M, Uttech KM, Lewis IK, Cohen HJ, Feussner JR. A method for assessing drug therapy appropriateness. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45(10):1045-51.
  • O'Mahony D, O'Sullivan D, Byrne S, O'Connor MN, Ryan C, Gallagher P. STOPP/START criteria for potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people: version 2. Age Ageing. 2015;44(2):213-8.
  • Zullo AR, Gray SL, Holmes HM, Marcum ZA. Screening for Medication Appropriateness in Older Adults. Clin Geriatr Med. 2018;34(1):39-54.


Additional Information

For questions about accessibility or to request accommodations please contact the IUSM CME office at 317-274-0104 or [email protected]. One week advance notice will allow us to provide seamless access. Please ensure to specify the accommodations you need in order to participate.


Credits
AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™ (1.00 hours), Non-Physician Attendance (1.00 hours), ACPE Contact Hours (1.00 hours), ANCC Contact Hours (1.00 hours)